Among 15 to 19 Year olds Teen Birth Rates Continue to Increase True or False

• Journal List
• HHS Author Manuscripts
• PMC4852976

J Adolesc Health. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2016 May 2.

Published in final edited form as:

PMCID: PMC4852976

NIHMSID: NIHMS707907

Adolescent Pregnancy, Birth, and Abortion Rates Across Countries: Levels and Recent Trends

Supplementary Materials

Appendix table 1.

GUID: F5D644DF-CB9F-4D17-9AE0-57A19BCCAF55

Appendix table 2.

GUID: E11A3B52-2BEF-4B13-B96F-FDE700B6891B

Abstract

Purpose

To examine pregnancy rates and outcomes (births and abortions) among 15- to 19-year olds and 10- to 14-year olds in all countries for which recent information could be obtained and to examine trends since the mid-1990s.

Methods

Information was obtained from countries' vital statistics reports and the United Nations Statistics Division for most countries in this study. Alternate sources of information were used if needed and available. We present estimates primarily for 2011 and compare them to estimates published for the mid-1990s.

Results

Among the 21 countries with complete statistics, the pregnancy rate among 15- to 19-year olds was the highest in the United States (57 pregnancies per 1,000 females) and the lowest rate was in Switzerland (8). Rates were higher in some former Soviet countries with incomplete statistics; they were the highest in Mexico and Sub-Saharan African countries with available information. Among countries with reliable evidence, the highest rate among 10- to 14-year olds was in Hungary. The proportion of teen pregnancies that ended in abortion ranged from 17% in Slovakia to 69% in Sweden. The proportion of pregnancies that ended in live births tended to be higher in countries with high teen pregnancy rates (p =.02). The pregnancy rate has declined since the mid-1990s in the majority of the 16 countries where trends could be assessed.

Conclusions

Despite recent declines, teen pregnancy rates remain high in many countries. Research on the planning status of these pregnancies and on factors that determine how teens resolve their pregnancies could further inform programs and policies.

Keywords: Teen pregnancies, Cross-national comparisons, Pregnancy trends, Pregnancy outcomes

The causes and consequences of teen pregnancies have been the topic of much research, policy and program discussion, and debate. Some studies have suggested that teen pregnancies compromise women's educational prospects and economic opportunities [1–3], and other work indicates that teen pregnancies are a marker of such conditions, rather than an underlying cause of them [4,5]. There does appear to be consensus, however, that teen pregnancies are associated with poor social and economic conditions and prospects.

A substantial proportion of teen births are intended in developing countries where many women still marry early [6]. However, even intended pregnancies to young women in low-resource settings are of policy and public health relevance because of the risks associated with them. The risk of death associated with pregnancy is about a third higher among 15- to 19-year olds than among 20- to 24-year olds [7]. It appears that young adolescents are also more likely to experience obstructed labor, fistula, and premature delivery and to give birth to low birth weight babies than older women [1].

Country-specific estimates of pregnancy, birth, and abortion levels among adolescents can motivate policy and programmatic responses to teen pregnancies and help monitor progress toward reducing their incidence. Countries with low levels of adolescent pregnancy might serve as references or models for efforts to reduce levels elsewhere. Even where incidence is low, data on teen pregnancies can highlight remaining unmet needs for information and services to help adolescents prevent unintended pregnancies.

Earlier reviews of adolescent pregnancy and childbearing rates across countries covered trends up to the mid-1990s and found that these events were becoming less common in the majority of countries for which evidence was available [8,9]. At that time, the teen pregnancy rate in the United States was higher than in any other developed country for which estimates were available except Russia. Regional estimates for the developing world indicated that adolescent birth rates were especially high in Sub-Saharan Africa [3].

We examine pregnancy incidence among adolescents (15–19 years old) and young adolescents (10–14 years old) in all developed and developing countries for which recent data on teen births and abortions could be obtained. We examine abortion ¹ and birth rates and the proportion of pregnancies that end in abortion in these countries and the correlation between adolescent pregnancy rates and the proportion of pregnancies that end in abortion. We examine trends in these rates since the mid-1990s through 2008–2011 where data allow.

Methods

To estimate teen ² and early adolescent pregnancy rates, we require data on numbers of births, abortions, and females 10–14 and 15–19 years old. For most countries, information on all three components was obtained, in descending order of preference, from countries' published vital statistics reports, compilations of these reports in the United Nations (UN) Statistics Division's Demographic Yearbook [10], the Transformative Monitoring for Enhanced Equity Database maintained by the United Nations Children's Fund [11], or the UN Population Division's population projections [12]. The data sources used for each component in each country are presented in Appendix Table 1.

Birth data are generally complete, but the collection and evaluation of abortion data and estimation of miscarriages merit additional discussion. Abortion reports in the sources previously mentioned include only procedures that were performed within the bounds of the law. In countries with liberal abortion laws, nearly all, if not all, abortions are legal. ³ However, abortion statistics are not complete for all countries, even for legal abortions. The quality of abortion statistics varies across countries and depends on a number of factors including whether abortion reporting is voluntary or required by law, whether all types of induced abortion procedures are required to be reported, whether there are consequences for failure to report abortions, such as lack of reimbursement for services rendered, whether there are financial disincentives to reporting abortions, such as tax obligations associated with abortion performed, and whether reporting systems have complete coverage of abortions provided in the private sector. The completeness of reporting can also change over time if circumstances that influence reporting change. In this analysis, we categorize countries into three groups:

1. Those with liberal laws whose official abortion statistics are deemed complete, that is, likely to include at least 90% of all abortions.

2. Those with liberal abortion laws and incomplete abortion statistics, or for which completeness of reports is uncertain.

3. Those with restrictive abortion laws, for which abortion estimates are available from country studies rather than official statistics.

Classifications of the completeness of abortion reports were based on expert assessments obtained for a recent study of abortion incidence [13]. ⁴ For that undertaking, input was sought from agencies involved in data collection and from local experts, primarily demographers and other researchers, on the completeness of official reports. In addition, comparisons with estimates from alternate sources, such as surveys of women, were made when such sources were available.

Additional details on the countries with incomplete statistics and those with restrictive abortion laws follow.

Countries with incomplete statistics

For countries with incomplete abortion statistics, pregnancy rates and the proportions of pregnancies that end in abortion presented here are lower than the true values because the numbers of abortions are undercounted. Such estimates are nevertheless useful because they indicate the minimum levels of both measures in these countries. For a few countries lacking official abortion reports with sufficient coverage, we used abortion estimates from alternate sources.

For the United States, we combined estimates of abortion incidence based on a 2010 census of abortion providers [14] with information on the age distribution of abortions compiled annually by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [15]. ⁵ Because the census is deemed to include more than 90% of abortions, the resulting estimates for the United States are classified as complete.

Data on the level of underreporting in each country are limited, and we did not attempt to quantify the level of underreporting beyond ascertaining whether reports included at least 90% of all abortions nor did we adjust statistics to account for possible levels of underreporting.

Countries with restrictive abortion laws

Reliable national estimates of age-specific incidence of abortion are available for only five countries with restrictive laws, all in Sub-Saharan Africa and Latin America: Burkina Faso, Ethiopia, Kenya, Malawi, and Mexico. ⁶ These abortion estimates are derived from country studies [16–20]. Abortion estimates in these countries include both legal and illegal abortions.

Miscarriages

The incidence of miscarriage was estimated on the basis of clinical studies of pregnancy loss by gestational age, which indicate that recognized miscarriages at five or more weeks of gestation are equal to approximately 20% of births plus 10% of induced abortions [21,22].Findings from recent surveys of women in the United States support these model-based estimates [23].

Birth rates are compared across all countries covered in this review regardless of whether the abortion and pregnancy rates are complete because births are not as vulnerable to under-reporting as abortions.

Adolescent pregnancy, birth, and abortion rates are the number of events per 1,000 females 15–19 years old. The rates for young adolescents are calculated as the number of events per 1,000 females 10–14 years old. Rates among young adolescents would likely be higher if they could be computed for 13–to14–year olds, to whom most of these events likely occur, but population estimates for this 2-year age group are not available for many countries. For all pregnancies, the adolescent's age is measured at the time of the pregnancy outcome. Confidence intervals are not presented because vital statistics on live births and populations are not considered estimates with uncertainty, but true population values.

The majority of findings presented here are for developed countries according to the UN classification of countries [24]. ⁷ We primarily present estimates for 2011, the most recent year for which information is available for most countries. If information was not available for 2011, we sought estimates for an earlier time period but not earlier than 2008. The only exception is Kenya, for which we report an estimate for 2012 because that is the only year for which relevant information is available.

We examine trends in countries for which estimates for the mid-1990s were previously published [8], if estimates are deemed to be sufficiently complete in both periods. The estimates for that period were similarly made across all possible countries and classified by completeness of reports. The previously published data included only births and abortions; we estimated numbers of miscarriages in the mid-1990s to render the pregnancy estimates comparable with those for 2011. Trends in teen pregnancy rates since the mid-1990s are presented both as the average annual change in absolute rate points and the annualized ⁸ percentage change in each country. Both measures are useful because the absolute point change can be large if the baseline rate is high, whereas the percentage change controls for differences in the baseline rate.

To examine the correlation between teen pregnancy rates and the proportion of pregnancies that ended in abortion in 2011, we used bivariate analyses of two continuous variables to estimate the correlation coefficient and associated p value.

Results

Among the 21 countries with liberal abortion laws and complete teen pregnancy estimates for 2008–2011, the rate was the highest in the United States (57 pregnancies per 1,000 adolescents in 2010), followed by New Zealand (51) and England and Wales (47) (Table 1). The lowest teen pregnancy rate was in Switzerland (8), followed by the Netherlands (14), Singapore (14), and Slovenia (14). Among countries with incomplete estimates, rates were high in Azerbaijan (67), Georgia (62), and Romania (61). Adolescent pregnancy rates were far higher in Mexico and the Sub-Saharan African countries than in any other countries in this review, ranging from 121 (Ethiopia) to 187 (Burkina Faso).

Table 1

Adolescent birth, abortion, and pregnancy rates and percentage of pregnancies ending in abortion among females 15–19 years old, 2011 or most recent prior year

Country	Year	Number of pregnancies	Rate per 1,000 females 15–19 years old			Pregnancies that end in abortion (%)
			Pregnanciesa	Abortions	Births
Countries with complete abortion statistics
Belgium	2009	6,800	21	8	10	38
Denmark	2011	3,600	21	14	5	67
England and Wales	2011	81,000	47	20	21	42
Estonia	2011	1,400	43	19	19	43
Finland	2011	3,700	23	13	8	55
France	2011	47,900	25	15	7	61
Hungary	2011	11,600	38	16	18	41
Iceland	2011	300	30	15	11	51
Israel	2011	6,800	23	8	13	32
Netherlands	2008	6,900	14	7	5	50
New Zealand	2011	7,900	51	18	26	36
Norway	2011	3,500	23	13	7	56
Portugal	2011	6,800	25	8	13	33
Scotland	2011	7,400	46	17	23	37
Singapore	2011	1,800	14	8	5	54
Slovakia	2011	5,900	33	6	22	17
Slovenia	2009	700	14	7	5	48
Spain	2011	28,000	26	13	10	50
Sweden	2010	9,000	29	20	6	69
Switzerland	2011	1,700	8	5	2	59
United States	2010	614,000	57	15	34	26
Countries with incomplete official abortion statistics
Albania	2009	3,400	23	1	18	4
Armeniab	2011	4,286	37	5	26	13
Azerbaijanb	2011	29,268	67	4	54	3
Belarus	2008	13,200	39	12	22	30
Canada	2011	29,900	28	12	13	42
Croatia	2011	2,100	17	3	12	17
Czech Republic	2011	5,800	20	7	11	33
Georgia	2011	9,900	62	11	42	17
Germany	2011	24,200	9	2	5	23
Hong Kong	2009	2,100	10	5	4	51
Japan	2010	38,500	13	7	4	53
Kazakhstanb	2011	25,915	40	4	29	10
Kyrgyzstanb	2011	16,130	57	6	41	11
Latviab	2011	1,631	28	9	15	33
Lithuania	2011	2,300	19	4	13	21
Macedoniab	2011	1,816	25	3	18	11
Moldova	2010	6,300	43	9	27	21
Mongolia	2008	4,400	29	5	19	17
Montenegrob	2011	397	19	1	14	6
Romania	2011	34,700	61	17	35	28
Russian Federation	2011	197,100	49	16	26	34
Serbiab	2011	5,010	26	3	19	11
Ukraine	2011	72,300	44	9	28	21
Countries with abortion estimates from country studiesc
Burkina Faso	2008	147,700	187	30	128	16
Ethiopia	2008	520,700	121	11	91	9
Kenya	2012	348,900	174	38	111	22
Malawi	2009	100,300	154	21	109	14
Mexico	2009	677,000	130	44	68	34

Because of a high teen pregnancy rate and large population, the estimated annual number of teen pregnancies was far higher in the United States (614,000) than any other country in this review. The number of teen pregnancies was also high in Mexico (677,000) and Ethiopia (521,000).

The birth rates in the countries with complete pregnancy estimates ranged from 2 (Switzerland) to 34 (the United States). However, teen birth rates can be fairly compared across a broader range of countries because these statistics are less prone to underreporting than are abortion rates. Among all 49 countries reviewed here, the rates were the highest by far in countries in Sub-Saharan Africa. The rate exceeded 90 in all four countries represented from this region and was the highest in Burkina Faso (128). Outside Sub-Saharan Africa, the highest teen birth rate was in Mexico (68), followed by Azerbaijan (54). Among the Northern, Western, and Southern European countries, the birth rate was the highest in Scotland (23) and England and Wales (21).

The highest adolescent abortion rate among countries with complete abortion records was in England and Wales (20) and Sweden (20). It was 15 in the United States. In about half of the countries, the rate was between 8 and 17. The teen abortion rate was the lowest in Switzerland (5). In Mexico and the countries in Sub-Saharan Africa, where abortion is largely illegal, the adolescent abortion rate ranged from 11 (Ethiopia) to 44 (Mexico).

The proportion of teen pregnancies that ended in abortion varied widely across the countries with complete estimates, from 17% in Slovakia to 69% in Sweden. In half of the countries, 35%–55% of pregnancies ended in abortion. This statistic was not calculated for the countries with incomplete abortion statistics. In Mexico and the countries in Sub-Saharan Africa, the proportion ranged from 9% in Ethiopia to 34% in Mexico.

Among countries whose reports are deemed to include at least 90% of all abortions done, the reports might still omit up to 10% of all abortions. If 10% of abortions were missing from these reports, the true percentage of pregnancies that ended in abortion would be 1.5%–2.4% points higher than indicated in our results (not shown).

For the countries with complete statistics, there is an inverse correlation between the pregnancy rate and the proportion of pregnancies ending in abortion (ρ = −49; p = .02; Figure 1). In countries with high teen pregnancy rates, a smaller proportion of those pregnancies ended in abortion. As a result, the spread in birth rates is even greater than the already large spread in pregnancy rates. For example, the U.S. teen pregnancy rate is about seven times that of Switzerland, but the U.S. birth rate is 15 times that of Switzerland.

Percentage of teen pregnancies ending in abortion is inversely correlated with teen pregnancy rate (ρ = −.53). BEL = Belgium; DEN = Denmark; ENG = England and Wales; EST = Estonia; FIN = Finland; FRA = France; HUN = Hungary; ICE = Iceland; ISR = Israel; NET = The Netherlands; NOR = Norway; NZ = New Zealand; POR = Portugal; SCO = Scotland; SIN = Singapore; SPA = Spain; SVK = Slovakia; SVN = Slovenia; SWE = Sweden; SWI = Switzerland; USA = United States.

Pregnancy, birth, and abortion rates among young adolescents (10–14 years old) are far lower than among 15- to 19-year olds (Table 2). Of the 23 countries for which birth rates to 10- to 14-year olds are presented, the highest was in Romania (1.40), followed by the United States (.45). In the majority of countries, there were fewer than .20 births per 1,000 10- to 14-year-old girls. Of the 11 countries with complete estimates of young adolescent pregnancy rates, the lowest was in Switzerland (.09) and the highest was in Hungary (1.19 pregnancies per 1,000 females 10–14 years old) and the United States (1.08). The rate was even higher in Romania (2.64) where it is likely underestimated. Estimates for this age group are not available from the studies conducted in countries with restrictive abortion laws. The percentage of pregnancies to girls in this age group that ended in abortion was the lowest in Slovakia (22%) and otherwise ranged from 46% in the United States to 87% in Sweden. Generally, a higher proportion of pregnancies to 10- to 14-year olds ended in abortion compared with the proportion among 15- to 19-year olds.

Table 2

Adolescent birth, abortion, and pregnancy rates and percentage of pregnancies ending in abortion among females 10–14 years old, 2011 or most recent prior year

Country	Year	Rate per 1,000 females 10–14 years old			Pregnancies that end in abortion (%)
		Pregnanciesa	Abortions	Births
Countries with complete abortion statistics
Estonia	2012	.27	.21	.04	77
Hungary	2011	1.19	.71	.34	60
New Zealand	2011	.73	.48	.17	65
Portugal	2011	.59	.30	.21	51
Singapore	2011	.22	.14	.06	63
Slovakia	2011	.50	.13	.30	26
Slovenia	2009	.12	.09	.02	71
Spain	2011	.64	.43	.14	67
Sweden	2010	.91	.79	.03	87
Switzerland	2010	.09	.07	.01	74
United States	2010	1.08	.49	.45	46
Countries with incomplete official abortion statistics
Belarus	2008	.22	.14	.06	62
Croatia	2011	.12	.03	.07	29
Czech Republic	2010	.27	.18	.07	64
Georgia	2008	.26	.03	.19	12
Hong Kong	2009	.23	.15	.05	65
Japan	2010	.18	.14	.02	80
Latvia	2010	.25	.13	.09	53
Lithuania	2011	.12	.03	.08	24
Moldova	2010	.21	.10	.08	49
Romania	2011	2.64	.87	1.40	33
Russian Federation	2011	.33	.18	.11	55
Serbia	2010	.46	.07	.32	14

Trends

The teen pregnancy rate declined in the majority of the 16 countries with complete estimates in both the mid-1990s and 2011 (Figure 2; see also Appendix Table 2 for pregnancy, birth, and abortion rates in the mid-1990s). The steepest annualized percentage change occurred in Estonia (4% per year). The decline might have been steeper in Russia and some other former Soviet countries, but incomplete abortion reports preclude an assessment of trends in these countries. The steepest average annual point change in the rate was in the United States (2.9 points per year, on average) where the rate was the highest in 1996. The teen pregnancy rate increased in Belgium and Sweden. However, current rates in these countries are still fairly low, at 21 and 29, respectively.

In most countries, the birth rate declined more steeply than the abortion rate. Exceptions are Hungary, Slovakia, and the United States where the abortion rate declined more steeply than the birth rate. In England and Wales, Finland, the Netherlands, Scotland, and Sweden, the teen abortion rate increased, whereas the teen birth rate declined.

Discussion

Although age-specific birth and abortion rates are periodically compiled across countries, this analysis represents the first known assessment of teen pregnancy rates, including births, abortions, and miscarriages, across a span of countries, and examination of trends since the mid-1990s across countries. In addition, this is the first to include teen pregnancy estimates for some countries with restrictive abortion laws.

We found that, despite a considerable decline in recent decades, the highest teen pregnancy rate in the developed world outside the former Soviet bloc is still in the United States, and the highest rates in Europe outside the former Soviet bloc are in England and Wales and Scotland. As in the 1980s and early 1990s, pregnancy rates continued to fall in the majority of countries with trend data.

This review is subject to some limitations. It only includes countries for which estimates of both births and abortions are available. Rates and trends could be different in countries that are not included in this review.

Age-specific pregnancy rates for narrower age groups would serve to more precisely identify those teens with high pregnancy rates. For example, in the United States and the United Kingdom, the pregnancy rate is higher among 18- to 19-year olds than among 15- to 17-year olds [25,26].

Trends are not always monotonic. In Canada, a more detailed review of data indicated that the teen pregnancy rate leveled off in 2006 after a period of decline [27]; in Sweden, the rate seems to have stabilized since about 2002, after a decade-long upward trend [28]; and in the United States, the pace of decline has been increasing [25].

Not surprisingly, adolescent pregnancy and birth rates are higher in Mexico and the countries in Sub-Saharan Africa than in the other countries in this review. In these regions, where norms often include early age at marriage and early start of child-bearing, a larger proportion of pregnancies to adolescents are likely to be intended than in developed countries. For example, in Sub-Saharan Africa as a whole, only about 35% of pregnancies to 15- to 19-year olds in 2007 were unintended [29]. The planning status of pregnancies to teens is not systematically collected across developed countries, but in the United States, it is estimated that 82% of pregnancies to teens are unintended [30].

This is a descriptive study, not an inferential one, and we did not examine the factors that explain the differences across countries or trends over time. However, much research has been directed at understanding the possible drivers of teen pregnancy rates across populations. The most important immediate determinants of pregnancy incidence are sexual activity and contraceptive nonuse. Evidence indicates that, across industrialized countries, differences exist in contraceptive prevalence among adolescents, more so than in the level of sexual activity [27,31,32]. Method mix and the effectiveness of the methods commonly used likely also influence differences in unintended pregnancy rates among teens across populations.

Among the more distal determinants of teen pregnancy rates are social, economic, and cultural factors. Evidence suggests that the level of national wealth, the pace of economic development, and the magnitude of income inequality within countries are all associated with differences in teen birth rates between countries[33].The level of acceptance of adolescent sexuality and the social expectation that teens will responsibly use contraception have also been linked to levels of contraceptive use [34]. Recent evidence from Europe indicates that the provision of free or subsidized contraceptives is associated with relatively low pregnancy and birth rates [35].

Studies have more frequently examined the relationship among social, economic, and cultural factors and differences in teen pregnancy rates within countries. In the United Kingdom and the United States, for example, teen pregnancy rates are higher in the most socioeconomically disadvantaged groups [25,26,36]. In the United States, the pregnancy rate is 100 among black teenagers and 38 among white teens (a rate that is still high for a developed country), ⁹ although this differential has decreased with time [37]. Qualitative research in the United Kingdom points to poor material circumstances, unhappiness at home or at school, and low expectations for the future as factors associated with high teen pregnancy rates [38].

At the other end of the spectrum, the very low teen pregnancy rate in Switzerland exists in the context of long-established sex education programs, widespread expectation that sexually active teens will use contraception, free family planning services and low-cost emergency contraception [39]. But even in Switzerland, statistics indicate that teen pregnancy rates vary with levels of education and cultural background of adolescent girls.

Teen birth rates are high in many Eastern Europe and Central Asian countries. These high rates have been attributed to a number of barriers to access to contraception. In some former Soviet countries, females under 18 years old cannot access sexual and reproductive health services without a parent's consent [39].Other barriers noted in situational analyses include the high cost of supplies, prescription requirements for some methods, limited numbers of outlets from which to obtain contraceptive supplies, lack of sexuality education programs (and poor quality of programs where they do exist), and cultural norms that limit the use of contraception [40,41].

The same proximate and distal factors that help explain differences in teen pregnancy rates across countries at one point in time have likely also contributed to trends in teen pregnancy rates over time. Relatively small downward trends in the prevalence of adolescent sexual activity and more substantial upward trends in contraceptive prevalence have been documented in the United States [32] and Canada [27].

We found that the proportion of teen pregnancies that end in abortion varies widely across countries with liberal abortion laws. The inverse association between the pregnancy rate and the proportion of pregnancies that end in abortion might reflect that a greater proportion of pregnancies are planned where rates are high. Alternately, it could suggest that the constellation of forces that make it hard for adolescents to prevent teen pregnancies (such as limited access to sexual and reproductive health services including family planning) also limit their ability to terminate unplanned pregnancies.

Additional research would help us better understand circumstances that can lead to teen pregnancies and how these circumstances can be influenced. Examination of the factors that influence whether an adolescent who gets pregnant will seek an abortion or have a child can also inform how adolescents can be supported in the face of a pregnancy. Moreover, further research to help disentangle the factors that are causally associated with unplanned teen pregnancies from the factors that are simply correlated with such pregnancies can inform interventions aimed at helping adolescent girls avoid unintended pregnancy and instead take advantage of other opportunities before them.

​

IMPLICATIONS AND CONTRIBUTION

Adolescent pregnancy rates declined since the mid-1990s in most developed countries with reliable trend data, but the rate remains exceptionally high in the United States Rates are even. higher in Sub-Saharan Africa and in some former Soviet countries where data quality is variable. The proportion of pregnancies ending in abortion varies widely across countries.

Supplementary Material

Appendix table 1

Appendix table 2

Acknowledgments

The funders played no role in the design or conduct of the study, the collection, management, analysis, or interpretation of the data, or the preparation, review, or approval of the article. The authors thank Heather Boonstra for her valuable feedback on the article and to Alyssa Tartaglione for her help preparing the article for submission. Preliminary findings from this undertaking were presented at the annual meeting of the American Public Health Association in Boston, MA, in November 2013 and the European Population Conference in Budapest, Hungary, in June 2014. G.S. and L.B.F. led the conceptualization of this undertaking, with input from S.S. and A.B. G.S. oversaw data collection, led the interpretation of findings, and drafted the article. L.B.F. conducted portions of the data analysis and revised portions of the article. L.B.F., A.B., and S.S. provided substantive input during data collection and interpretation of findings and reviewed drafts of the article. M.A.E. collected and managed the data, helped prepare tables, and reviewed drafts of the article. All authors had access to all the data in the study and can take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the analysis.

Funding Sources

This research was funded by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention through a cooperative agreement between the Office of Population Affairs at the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, and the Guttmacher Institute (Cooperating Agreement # 1-FPRPA006050-01-00) and by a grant from the Dutch Ministry of Foreign Affairs (Grant # 24590).

Appendix

Appendix Table 1

Data sources used for adolescent births, abortions, and population counts by country.

Country	Year	Birth data	Abortion data	Population data
Albania	2009	UNPD Interpolation	DHS	UNSD
Armenia	2011	UNICEF	UNICEF	UNSD
Azerbaijan	2011	UNICEF	UNICEF	UNPD Interpolation
Belgium	2009	Statistics Belgium	National Commission of Evaluation	UNSD
Burkina Faso	2008	UNPD Interpolation	Guttmacher Institute	UNSD Interpolation
Canada	2011	Statistics Canada	Canadian Institute for Health Information	UNSD
Denmark	2011	Statistics Denmark	National Institute for Health and Welfare	UNSD
England and Wales	2011	Office for National Statistics	Department of Health	Office of National Statistics
Estonia	2011	National Institute for Health Development	National Institute for Health Development	Statistics Estonia
Ethiopia	2008	UNPD Interpolation	Singh et al. 2008	Singh et al. 2008 ref. 18
Finland	2011	Statistics Finland	National Institute for Health and Welfare	Statistics Finland
France	2011	UNSD	Ministry of Social Affairs and Health	National Institute of Statistics and Economic Studies
Germany	2011	UNPD Interpolation	Statistisches Bundesamt	UNSD
Iceland	2011	Statistics Iceland	Statistics Iceland	Statistics Iceland
Israel	2011	Central Bureau of Statistics Israel	Central Bureau of Statistics Israel	Central Bureau of Statistics Israel
Kazakhstan	2011	UNICEF	UNICEF	UNPD Interpolation
Kenya	2012	African Population and Health Research Center et al. 2013	African Population and Health Research Center et al. 2013	Kenya National Bureau of Statistics
Kyrgyzstan	2011	UNICEF	UNICEF	UNSD
Latvia**	2011	UNICEF	UNICEF	UNPD Interpolation
Macedonia	2011	UNICEF	UNICEF	UNSD
Malawi	2009	UNSD	Levandowski et al. 2012, special tabulations	UNSD
Mexico	2009	National Population Council, Mexico	Juarez and Singh 2012	National Population Council, Mexico
Mongolia	2008	UNSD	Mongolia Department of Health	UNSD
Montenegro	2011	UNICEF	UNICEF	UNSD
Netherlands	2008	UNSD	National Abortion Register	UNSD
New Zealand	2011	New Zealand Statistics	New Zealand Statistics	New Zealand Statistics
Norway	2011	Statistics Norway	Norwegian Institute of Public Health	Statistics Norway
Portugal	2009	UNSD	Portugal Ministry of Health	UNSD
Russian Federation	2011	UNSD	UNSD	United Interdepartmental Statistical Information System (EMISS)
Scotland	2011	Information Services Division	Information Services Division	General Register Office for Scotland
Serbia **	2011	UNICEF	UNICEF	UNSD
Sweden	2010	UNSD	UNSD	Statistics Sweden
Switzerland	2011	Swiss Statistics	Swiss Statistics	Swiss Statistics
United States	2010	National Center for Health Statistics	Kost et al. 2014	U.S. Census Bureau

Appendix Table 2

Adolescent pregnancy, abortion and birth rates, countries with complete abortion reports, 1996 or most recent prior year

		Rates per 1,000 females 15–19
Country	Year	Pregnancies*	Abortions	Births
Estonia	1996	76	33	33
Slovenia	1996	23	11	9
Hungary	1996	68	30	30
Iceland	1996	50	21	22
Norway	1996	37	19	14
United States	1996	97	29	54
Slovak Republic	1995	51	11	32
Israel	1995	32	10	18
Denmark	1995	26	14	8
New Zealand	1995	63	20	34
England and Wales	1995	55	19	28
Scotland	1995	48	15	27
Netherlands	1992	14	4	8
Finland	1996	24	11	10
Sweden	1996	28	17	8
Belgium	1995	16	5	9

Footnotes

¹Unless otherwise indicated, "abortion" refers to induced abortions throughout this report.

²The terms "teens" and "adolescents" are used interchangeably in these analyses to refer to 15– to 19–year olds.

³Countries with highly restrictive laws and official reports of legal abortions performed are not included in this review because legal abortions account for a very small proportion of all procedures done in those countries.

⁴The study on abortion incidence referenced here includes more countries than the present study because data on age-specific abortion incidence is needed to compute teen pregnancy rates, and age-specific data are not available for all countries with overall abortion estimates.

⁵Centers for Disease Control and Prevention estimates of the age distribution of women who have abortions are based on abortion reports that are deemed to include about 70% of all abortions done in the United States.

⁶In Mexico, less than 10% of women of reproductive age live in the Federal District where abortion is permitted on demand up to 12 weeks of gestation. Although the conditions under which abortion is legally allowed in Ethiopia were recently broadened, it is still counted among countries with restrictive laws.

⁷Developing countries covered in this report include Armenia, Azerbaijan, Georgia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgystan, Hong Kong, Israel, and Mongolia, all of which have liberal abortion laws, and Burkina Faso, Ethiopia, Kenya, Malawi, and Mexico where abortion laws are restrictive.

⁸Calculated, for example, as (Rate₂₀₁₁/Rate₁₉₉₅) (1/[2011 – 1995]) − 1.

⁹Rates are for 2008.

Conflicts of Interest: The authors do not have financial relationships with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work. They have no other relationships or activities that could influence or appear to have influenced the submitted work.

Supplementary Data

Supplementary data related to this article can be found at http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2014.09.007.

References

1. UNFPA. Motherhood in childhood: Facing the challenge of adolescent pregnancy: The State of World Population 2013. New York: United Nations Population Fund; 2013. pp. 163–196. [Google Scholar]

3. National Research Council. Growing up global: The changing transitions to adulthood in developing countries. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2005. [Google Scholar]

4. Coyne CA, D'Onofrio BM. Some (but not much) progress toward understanding teenage childbearing: A review of research from the past decade. Adv Child Dev Behav. 2012;42:113–152. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

5. Korenman S, Fales S. The socioeconomic effects of teenage childbearing: A review of the recent literature. New York: Baruch College, City University of New York; 2011. [Google Scholar]

6. Kothari MT, Wang S, Head S, et al. Trends in adolescent reproductive and sexual behaviors. DHS Comparative Reports No. 29. Calverton, MD: ICF International; 2012. [Google Scholar]

7. Nove A, Matthews Z, Neal S, et al. Maternal mortality in adolescents compared with women of other ages: Evidence from 144 countries. The Lancet Glob Health. 2012;2:e155–e154. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

8. Singh S, Darroch JE. Adolescent pregnancy and childbearing: Levels and trends in developed countries. Fam Plann Perspect. 2000;32:14–23. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

9. Singh S. Adolescent childbearing in developing countries: A global review. Stud Fam Plann. 1998;29:117–136. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

11. UNICEF. [Accessed September 1, 2013]; The Transformative Monitoring for Enhanced Equity (Trans-MonEE) database. 2013 Available at: http://www.transmonee.org/

12. United Nations Population Division, Population estimates and projections section. [Accessed January 16, 2014]; World population prospects: The 2012 revision. Available at: http://esa.un.org/unpd/wpp/index.htm.

13. Sedgh G, Singh S, Henshaw SK, et al. Legal abortion worldwide in 2008: Levels and recent trends. Int Persp Sex Reprod Health. 2011;37:84–94. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

14. Jones RK, Jerman J. Abortion incidence and service availability in the United States, 2011. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2014;46:3–14. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

16. Sedgh G, Rossier C, Kaboré I, et al. Estimating abortion incidence in Burkina Faso using two methodologies. Stud Fam Plann. 2011;42:147–154. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

17. Singh S, Fetters T, Gebreselassie H, et al. The estimated incidence of induced abortion in Ethiopia, 2008. Int Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2010;36:16–25. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

18. Levandowski BA, Mhango C, Kuchingale E, et al. The incidence of induced abortion in Malawi. Int Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2013;39:88–96. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

19. Juarez F, Singh S. Incidence of induced abortion by age and state, Mexico, 2009: New estimates using a modified methodology. Int Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2012;38:58–67. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

20. Mohamed SF, Izugbara C, Moore AM, et al. The incidence of induced abortion in Kenya. Manuscript submitted to the British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology [Google Scholar]

21. Bongaarts J, Potter RG. Fertility, biology, and behavior: An analysis of the proximate determinants. New York: Academic Press; 1983. [Google Scholar]

22. Leridon H. Human fertility: The basic components. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1977. [Google Scholar]

23. Finer LB, Henshaw SK. Disparities in rates of unintended pregnancy in the United States, 1994 and 2001. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2006;38:90–96. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

24. United Nations Statistics Division. [Accessed August 1, 2014]; Composition of macro geographical (continental) regions, geographical sub-regions, and selected economic and other groupings. Available at: http://unstats.un.org/unsd/methods/m49/m49regin.htm.

25. Kost K, Henshaw S. U.S. teenage pregnancies, births and abortions, 2010: National and state trends by age, race and ethnicity. New York: Guttmacher Institute; 2014. [Google Scholar]

26. Wilkinson P, French R, Kane R, et al. Teenage conceptions, abortions, and births in England, 1994–2003, and the national teenage pregnancy strategy. Lancet. 2006;368:1879–1886. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

27. Mckay A. Trends in Canadian national and provincial/territorial teen pregnancy rates: 2001–2010. Can J Hum Sex. 2012;21:161–175. [Google Scholar]

28. McKay A, Barrett M. Trends in teen pregnancy from 1996–2006: A comparison of Canada, Sweden, U.S.A. and England/Wales. Can J Hum Sex. 2010;19:43–52. [Google Scholar]

29. Biddlecom AE, Singh S, Bankole A, et al. Protecting the next generation in Sub-Saharan Africa: Learning from adolescents to prevent HIV and unintended pregnancy. New York: Guttmacher Institute; 2007. [Google Scholar]

30. Finer LB, Zolna MR. Shifts in intended and unintended pregnancies in the United States, 2001–2008. Am J Public Health. 2014;104(Suppl):S43–S48. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

31. Santelli J, Sandfort T, Orr M. Transnational comparisons of adolescent contraceptive use: What can we learn from these comparisons? Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2008;162:92–94. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

32. Santelli JS, Melnikas AJ. Teen fertility in transition: Recent and historic trends in the United States. Annu Rev Public Health. 2010;31:371–383. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

33. Santelli JS, Sharma V, Viner R. Inequality, national wealth, economic development and global trends in teenage birth rates, 1990–2010. J Adolesc Health. 2013;53:S4–S5. [Google Scholar]

35. Part K, Moreau C, Donati S, et al. Teenage pregnancies in the European Union in the context of legislation and youth sexual and reproductive health services. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2013;92:1395–1406. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

36. Humby P. An analysis of under 18 conceptions and their links to measures of deprivation, England and Wales, 2008–10. London: Office for National Statistics; 2013. [Accessed January 16, 2014]. Available at: http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/dcp171766_299768.pdf. [Google Scholar]

38. Harden A, Brunton G, Fletcher A, et al. Teenage pregnancy and social disadvantage: Systematic review integrating controlled trials and qualitative studies. BMJ. 2009;339:b4254. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

39. Narring F, Yaron M. Adolescent pregnancy in Switzerland. In: Cherry AL, Dillon ME, editors. International handbook of adolescent pregnancy. New York: Springer Science + Business Media; 2014. pp. 599–604. [Google Scholar]

41. ASTRA Network. Sexual and reproductive health and rights of adolescents in Central and Eastern Europe and Balkan countries. [Accessed August 4, 2014]; ASTRA Youth report. 2011 Available at: http://www.astra.org.pl/pdf/publications/SRHRAY2011.pdf.

mcwilliamsthatures.blogspot.com

Source: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4852976/

Share this post